"Månader av ont blod mellan McCarthy och Demokraterna sänkte honom"

Den ständigt leende talmannen föll på eget grepp. ”Han ägnade nio månader åt att försöka blidka en omedgörlig grupp i Republikanernas högerflank och böjde sig för deras krav på ett sätt som skadade representanthuset som institution”, skriver Washington Post-redaktören Paul Kane i en analys efter att republikanen Kevin McCarthy igår röstades bort. Men flanken nöjde sig aldrig utan vände sig emot McCarthy med Floridarepublikanen Matt Gaetz i spetsen. Han vädjade då till representanthusets demokrater – men möttes av frustration och ilska. – Han har skapat kaos i representanthuset, och han säger att vi löser problemet genom att behålla honom i den positionen? Det argumentet håller inte, säger demokraten Adam Smith till tidningen. (Svensk översättning av Omni). Kevin McCarthy learned a painful lesson: There's a price to pay for helping set fire to an institution and then asking the fire department to come save your office. By Paul Kane October 3, 2023 The California Republican spent nine months as House speaker trying to placate an intractable group of hard-right Republicans, bowing to their demands in ways that hurt the House as an institution. They were never satisfied and turned on McCarthy, setting in motion Tuesday's vote to expel him as speaker. By late Monday, after enough Republicans had made their intentions known, it was clear that McCarthy could not win just from votes on his side of the aisle, as is the House tradition. So he turned to Democrats to ask for help putting out the fire of an internal GOP rebellion that he helped start. It wasn't even a close call. "Nobody trusts Kevin McCarthy. Nobody trusts Kevin McCarthy," Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), a leading liberal, told reporters after a raucous morning caucus. With that, the always-smiling Republican got expelled from the speaker's office nine months to the day he lost the first 14 of 15 ballots in trying to win the gavel. After all the concessions McCarthy had made to his right flank to finally win, Democrats could not believe some Republicans were asking them to save McCarthy's political life. Some of their voices filled with anger, they said they no longer saw him as the good-natured young Republican who befriended them a decade before in the House gym and planned bipartisan, group bike rides. They viewed him as morphing - fairly quickly over the past three years - into a craven, unprincipled leader just trying to cling to power for the sake of power alone. Some Democrats pitied him and all his efforts to appease a group of intransigent right-wing radicals. But they said he had to pay a price for making so many promises and backing away from them. They recalled how, immediately after the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection, McCarthy blamed President Donald Trump and called for an independent commission to investigate, only to throw his support behind Trump after he left office and to oppose a deep investigation. "He has brought chaos to the House, and he's saying keeping him in that position is how we solve that problem? That's an argument that just isn't selling," said Rep. Adam Smith of Washington state, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee and co-author of a Pentagon policy bill that won the panel's approval 58-1. In a letter to Democrats minutes before Tuesday's pivotal vote, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) cited that legislation as a key example of McCarthy's deceit. Rather than advance such a bill with broad support, he caved to a few hard-right Republicans and loaded the legislation up with culture-war policy riders that passed on a narrow partisan vote. Jeffries, who has held a cordial public relationship with McCarthy, left no doubt that his party would unanimously support taking the gavel from him, rating McCarthy as no different from the most extreme elements of the GOP. "Given their unwillingness to break from MAGA extremism in an authentic and comprehensive manner, House Democratic leadership will vote yes on the pending Republican Motion to Vacate the Chair," Jeffries wrote to Democratic lawmakers just minutes before votes started, referring to Trump's "Make America Great Again" slogan. So when the House began its vote series, after 1:30 p.m., the biggest remaining issue was whether Democrats had so many absences, for health and family reasons, that McCarthy might narrowly skate by. That ended when 11 Republicans joined 207 Democrats to defeat a procedural motion that would have cut off the effort, led by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), a longtime irritant to the speaker who has spent weeks preparing for this vote. In fact, after formally making the motion Monday, Gaetz told reporters on the Capitol steps that he expected some Democrats to give McCarthy a political lifeline. "That's the likely outcome," he said, predicting failure and suggesting he would keep offering motions to defeat the speaker. "This won't be the only time." Instead, Gaetz got to oversee one hour of debate before the final vote, decamping to the Democratic side of the aisle to work at a table usually reserved for leading liberals who despise him. On the final vote, 208 Democrats and eight Republicans voted against McCarthy, with 210 GOP lawmakers supporting him. McCarthy's allies had hoped that senior Democrats who care for the institution, particularly Rep. Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, who served 20 years in leadership and has traveled abroad with McCarthy, would find a way to give him enough support. First elected in 2006, McCarthy spent his first 12 years in office well liked on both sides of the aisle. He worked out in the House gym with a bipartisan crowd. Rep. Patrick T. McHenry (R-N.C.), a close McCarthy confidant who is now serving as acting speaker, noted that McCarthy tried to treat Jeffries better than then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) treated him the previous four years. He warned that expelling a speaker midterm will be a major "inflection" point by expelling a speaker midterm. McCarthy did call Jeffries on Monday evening, but no one is sure what the two men discussed. On Tuesday morning, McCarthy told reporters he would not be offering concessions to win over their votes. If Democrats were to save him, it would just have been out of the rapport they had with him or for the sake of avoiding throwing the House into the chaos that now consumes it. Instead, Democrats said that the McCarthy they knew and liked from his days about a decade ago, when he held a junior GOP leadership post, had become unrecognizable compared with the man who gave in to so many hard-right demands. "I don't distinguish that sharply between Kevin McCarthy and Matt Gaetz," Rep. Jaime B. Raskin (D-Md.) said Monday. Raskin, a manager in Trump's second impeachment trial, noted that McCarthy, in the aftermath of the Capitol attack, was the first high-ranking leader to call for an independent commission to investigate. But within weeks of the assault, McCarthy traveled to visit Trump and made amends, then worked against a commission and the eventual House Jan. 6 committee. When he won the speaker's race in early January, McCarthy did so only by agreeing to weaken the motion that Gaetz used this week against him, making it far easier for a tiny faction to force chaos. "This speaker and Republican Conference have done everything they can to bring us to this point of chaos, to have an unstable House of Representatives," Rep. Mark Takano (R-Calif.) told reporters Tuesday. In May, McCarthy clinched a debt-and-budget deal with President Biden that set a framework for federal agency funding for the next two years while also allowing the Treasury Department to continue borrowing. Within weeks he backed away from that deal when he faced pressure from hard-right Republicans, who contended they had won promises from him that set spending much lower. Faced with two competing promises, McCarthy went with the GOP lawmakers and ordered the House Appropriations Committee to slash more than $100 billion from the budget. And in September, after publicly promising to hold a vote to launch impeachment proceedings against Biden, he declared on his own that an "impeachment inquiry" was underway, even though his own rank-and-file cast doubt about allegations against the president. "Kevin McCarthy hasn't done anything that would be speaker-trustworthy," Takano said. Of course, Republicans who voted to oust him Tuesday said they had the same problem: trust. Over and over, they said, McCarthy would make a commitment to them for some legislation or favor, only to learn that he had some other commitment to another set of Republicans that was in direct conflict. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), who holds moderate views on abortion rights, said she thought she had pledges from him to advance bills to expand access to birth control and rape kits, only to see nothing happen because of antiabortion opposition inside the caucus. "I've made deals with Kevin McCarthy, with the speaker, that he has not kept to help women in this country," she told reporters after the vote. His actions the past week summed up his time as speaker, leaving so many people feeling burned by McCarthy. After moving hard to the right on government funding bills, he hit the Saturday deadline to force a government shutdown or pass legislation with Democrats. He had told conservatives for weeks that he wouldn't pass legislation with Democrats - only to decide to do just that in a last-minute pivot. Conservatives were infuriated. McCarthy then publicly clashed with Biden over whether he had made a private pledge for legislation to fund military support for Ukraine, leaving all sides of that debate confused about his position. And on a Sunday show appearance that was shown to the rank-and-file Democrats on Tuesday, the now ex-speaker blamed the near shutdown of the federal government on Democrats. "We are not saving Kevin McCarthy," Jayapal said afterward. © 2023 The Washington Post. Sign up for the Today's Worldview newsletter here.

Valet splittrar herr och fru Nix: "Hatet kommer från andra sidan"

Valet splittrar herr och fru Nix: "Hatet kommer från andra sidan"

Advokaten Robert Nix från Philadelphia säger att han är republikan i själ och hjärta. Men han tänker inte rösta på presidentkandidaten Donald Trump och är aktiv i en organisation med republikaner som kritiserar den före detta presidenten. Nix lägger i år motvilligt sin röst på Kamala Harris.

– Ett tufft beslut. Harris är inte en kandidat som jag hoppar runt av glädje omkring. Men jag röstar på henne för att jag sätter landet framför partifrågan. Röstade på Biden Nix röstade på Joe Biden år 2020, trots att Nix varit republikan sedan åttiotalet. Strax efter Trumps seger 2016 ångrade han sitt val. Han såg snabbt hur samhället förändrades

– Handlingarna under presidentskapet går nästan inte att reparera. Det gäller rättssystemet och att hans sätt att försvåra för pressen, till exempel.

Robert Nix porträtt syns på en gigantisk skylt intill en av de viktigaste motorvägarna i Philadelphia. Han är en del av en kampanj där republikaner röstar på Harris. Vänner och bekanta har i tysthet låtit honom försvinna bort i sociala medier. Ingen har betett sig illa säger Robert Nix, men det har varit mycket tydligt att republikanska kollegor ofta ser honom som avfälling. Frun sympatiserar med Trump Hemmavid pratar familjen inte längre om politik. Roberts hustru, hårfrisörskan Erica, sympatiserar starkt med Trump. Hon är kritisk till de etiketter som demokrater klistrar på Trumps anhängare säger hon:

– Det är vi som är rasister, vi är fascister. Men hatet som jag ser, ja det kommer från den andra sidan.

För Robert Nix är problemet att det republikanska partiet förändrats i grunden med Donald Trump. Hur det blir framöver kommer att vara sammankopplat med valresultatet. Men även om Trump skulle förlora tror Nix att republikanska ”fundamentalister” kommer att påverka de närmaste valen i USA, antagligen en bit in på 2030-talet, tror han.

Stor splittring i nyckelstaten: "Harris är sänd av djävulen"

Stor splittring i nyckelstaten: "Harris är sänd av djävulen"

Både republikaner och demokrater är igång med upploppet av sina kampanjer och både Kamala Harris och Donald Trump har gjort otaliga besök i delstaten. När Nyheterna befinner sig i delstaten Pennsylvania råkar Donald Trump ha kommit för att besöka en McDonalds restaurang där han ska arbeta med att fritera pommes frites under några skälvande kampanjminuter. ”Hon är ond” Ute på gatan väntar mängder med människor längs bilens kortegeväg. Det finns egentligen inga officiella kampanjtider, men ryktet har naturligtvis gått. Det blir hätskt i folkmassan när ett par Harrissupportrar börjar diskutera med trumpisterna. Och språket är hårt när en Trumpanhängare beskriver Harris. Det är ingen tvekan om att nerverna ligger utanpå. – Hon är ond, sänd av djävulen. Trump kommer återinföra den moral vi hade före Biden, säger Trumpväljaren Will Dunklin.

I valet 2016 vann Donald Trump i Pennsylvania och 2020 hette segraren Joe Biden. Det handlade om några tusen röster som avgjorde valet. Demokraterna har en väloljad kampanjorganisation. ”Varje röst räknas” Två av aktivisterna som Nyheterna träffar berättar att de kommer ifrån en organisation som verkar mot skjutvapenvåld och som stödjer Kamala Harris. De har kommit från den angränsande delstaten New Jersey för att hjälpa till med kampanjandet här eftersom det är så viktigt att vinna i Pennsylvania. Kvinnorna ägnar några timmar åt dörrknackning i valkretsen Bucks County – som är särskilt osäker. Ett direkt möte med en kampanjaktivist anses fortfarande vara den bästa metoden för att vinna de osäkra väljarna. – Jag är väldigt motiverad. Väljarundersökningarna pekar på ett jämt val. Harris-Walz-kampanjen tar inget för givet. Varje röst räknas. I synnerhet i Pennsylvania, säger en av aktivisterna, Fran Carrol, som är kampanjarbetare för Kamala Harris. Ingen vågar förutspå En arg ung man blåser i en trumpet och prisar Trump. Han tycker att både aktivisterna och vi i TV-teamet borde ge oss av från Bucks County. Fran Carrol och hennes aktivistkollega konstaterar att det är ett irritationsmoment, men att de flesta människor ändå bemöter dem med artighet och respekt.

Vem som vinner? Den frågan vill ingen svara på i något av lägren. Alla hoppas, men inte ens de mest inbitna supportrar vågar förutspå hur det går.

Experten: Två saker kan påverka utgången av presidentvalet i USA

Experten: Två saker kan påverka utgången av presidentvalet i USA

Donald Trump har blandat och gett under den senaste veckan. En utdragen dansshow och en anekdot om en gammal proffsgolfares könsorgan har blandats med förslag om att sätta in militären mot politiska motståndare och uttalanden om att stormningen av Kapitolium var ”en dag av kärlek”. Kamala Harris har å sin sida ifrågasatt Trumps form och tvivlat på om 78-åringen kan klara av en ny presidentperiod. Enligt USA-kännaren Andreas Utterström är det inget som egentligen förvånar, utan han menar att vi nu befinner oss i något form av vakuum eftersom det inte längre finns några givna programpunkter fram till valdagen. – De har hamnat lite i sina gamla greatest hits. Trump fortsätter komma med oväntade utspel som stärker bilden av honom som en icke-traditionell politiker som skjuter från höften, medan Harris fastnat i att kritisera Trump, säger han. Fortsätter växa bland unga män Harris möjliga segerrecept, och förklaring till fokuset på Trump, beror enligt Utterström på att man ser en chans att vinna osäkra väljare i svängstaterna som tvivlar på Trump som person. Samtidigt visar mätningar att den 78-årige expresidenten fortsätter att växa bland unga män – en grupp som opinionsmätningar har missat i beräkningar inför tidigare val, och som kan leda Trump till en vinst. – Han omfamnar karikatyren av sig själv, nästan som en seriefigur. Det finns många som lockas av det och som är trötta på vanliga gamla politiker och vill se någon som rör om i grytan eller spränger systemet inifrån, säger Utterström. Två saker kan påverka utgången av valet Med bara veckor kvar till det rekordjämna valet beskrivs det ofta som att minsta lilla röst kan fälla avgörandet. Men i slutändan ser Andreas Utterström att det egentligen bara är två saker som kan påverka utgången. Det nyckfulla vädret i USA – eller ett skandalavslöjande om Kamala Harris. – Sofflocket kan avgöra. Om det blåser halv storm i en svingstat eller ösregnar, och alla som inte har förtidsröstat väljer att stanna hemma. Det eller att det avslöjas något om Harris, i stil med något lik i garderoben eller att hon inte är den som hon utgett sig för att vara. Det kan påverka. Historien visar att skandaler inte biter på Trump, säger han.

Donald Trump på YouTube

What's behind the alliance between Donald Trump and Elon Musk? Reporter weighs in

CNN's Anderson Cooper talks to Washington Post reporter Philip Bump and New York Times reporter Ryan Mac about the ...

CNN på YouTube

Former President Donald Trump holds a Town Hall in Fayetteville, North Carolina

Former President Donald Trump holds a Town Hall in Fayetteville, North Carolina. Read more: ...

The National Desk på YouTube

Wife of Man Killed at Donald Trump Rally Returns to Site

Helen Comperatore says she is filled with dread as she prepares to return to the location of the worst day of her life. On July 13 the ...

Inside Edition på YouTube

LIVE | Iran Israel Conflict: Donald Trump Says Israel Should Hit Nuclear Facilities First

LIVE | Iran Israel Conflict: Donald Trump Says Israel Should Hit Iran's Nuclear Facilities Amid the heightened West Asia crisis, ...

Firstpost på YouTube

Donald Trump Warns of World War 3 In Milwaukee, Wisconsin | Israel Vs Iran War News | LIVE | N18G

Donald Trump Warns of World War 3 In Milwaukee, Wisconsin | Israel vs Iran War News | LIVE | N18G Watch LIVE as former ...

CNN-News18 på YouTube

Donald Trump i poddar

What to expect from President Trump 2.0

Despite being banned from the ballot paper in two states (so far) and multiple legal hurdles, Donald Trump is the clear favourite to return as the Republican candidate for US president, and opinion polls also give him the edge in a rematch with Joe Biden. Trump has joked about becoming a "dictator" for a day if he wins, and says he would carry out mass deportations – and that’s just the beginning of his plans for a second term.This podcast was brought to you thanks to the support of readers of The Times and The Sunday Times. Subscribe today: thetimes.co.uk/storiesofourtimes. Guest: David Charter, US Editor, The Times.Host: Manveen Rana.Clips: Sky News, ABC News, New York Post, CBS News, Trump 2024, The Economic Times, Fox News, The 700 Club, CNN, US Network Pool, Forbes, The Benny Show. Read more: Will Donald Trump still run in 2024? The Colorado decision explainedIf Donald Trump becomes US president again, here’s what he’ll doEmail us: storiesofourtimes@thetimes.co.ukFind out more about our bonus series for Times subscribers: 'Inside the newsroom' Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Donald Trump: Dictator in Chief?

The shadow looming over the fourth Republican debate was the party’s most recent president, Donald Trump. But while the other candidates traded blows at one another, Trump was conspicuously absent, instead taking part in a town hall event on Tuesday evening. He raised eyebrows when saying he would only be a dictator on ‘day one’ if elected president. The Americast team chew over Trump’s comments – and the Republican debate – before speaking to GOP candidate Asa Hutchinson, the former governor of Arkansas who’s still in the race for the White House.And, a clip of American university leaders has gone viral after they failed to say explicitly to Congress that calling for the genocide of Jewish people violated their schools code of conduct. The team assesses how we’ve reached this point. HOSTS: • Justin Webb, Radio 4 presenter • Marianna Spring, disinformation and social media correspondent • Anthony Zurcher, North America correspondent GUEST: • Asa Hutchinson, Republican presidential candidate GET IN TOUCH: • Join our online community: https://discord.gg/qSrxqNcmRB • Send us a message or voice note via WhatsApp to +44 330 123 9480 • Email Americast@bbc.co.uk • Or use #Americast Find out more about our award-winning “undercover voters” here: bbc.in/3lFddSF. This episode was made by George Dabby with Alix Pickles, Catherine Fusillo, Claire Betzer and Maia Davies. The technical producer was Mike Regaard. The series producer is George Dabby. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham.

You've Got Mailbag

At the end of every episode of Prosecuting Donald Trump, we ask you to submit your questions and today, we finally have a chance to answer some of them. As we’re all reflecting on the year ahead, Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord answer your questions about 2023’s legal landscape and what’s to come in 2024. 

Will the courts Trump the Donald?

Today, we look at Donald Trump’s disqualification from the Colorado ballot.The state’s Supreme Court has ruled him ineligible because of his actions in the run up to the US Capital riot in 2021. Americast’s Sarah Smith and Justin Webb join to discuss whether this could be the beginning of the end for his 2024 bid.And the departing First Minister of Wales, Mark Drakeford, is in the studio to talk about his political legacy, as well as really liking cheese. You can join our Newscast online community here: https://tinyurl.com/newscastcommunityhere Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest political news stories from the BBC. It was presented by Adam Fleming. It was made by Chris Flynn with Gemma Roper, Sam McLaren and Joe Wilkinson. The technical producer was Matt Dean. The senior news editors are Jonathan Aspinwall and Sam Bonham.

Disqualified in Colorado

For the first time in history, the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate from running for office. In this special breaking news episode, MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord react to the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to disqualify former president Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 presidential ballot under the Constitution's insurrection clause. Andrew and Mary discuss what the court’s decision means and the potential fallout. Note: Trump’s legal team intends to appeal the decision. 

BONUS: The Full Presidential Immunity Hearing

Former President Donald Trump appeared in federal court Tuesday morning as his lawyers argued that he is immune from prosecution on charges to overturn the 2020 election. Listen to the full hearing here. 

Is America about to give Donald Trump a second chance? Dispatch from the Deep South

Emily reports from Georgia, the eye of the Donald Trump legal storm, where he was caught on tape trying to get an election official to 'find' him more votes to win the 2020 election. A year out from 2024, is this purple state closer to staying blue or turning MAGA red? The latter could tip the election in Trump's favour. And we cross state lines to the hometown of the woman who could capitalise should a jail cell call for the Donald. Nikki Haley. Could she prove to be the Republican nominee come election day?And...Jon is in Paris, France- and he's nabbed the Mayor of Detroit - Mike Duggan. Don't ask how. He talks to the man in charge of a crucial blue city in a crucial swing state. Editor & Field Producer: Gabriel RadusVideo Producer: Rory SymonYou can listen to this episode on Alexa - just say "Alexa, ask Global Player to play The News Agents USA".

DC Drama

Former president Donald Trump renewed his efforts to delay the DC election subversion case by asking for a halt in all proceedings while his appeal on presidential immunity moves through the courts. Meanwhile, Special Counsel Jack Smith is pushing to keep the trial on schedule by bringing the issue before the Supreme Court. MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord break down Smith’s strategy and what this could mean for the former president’s other criminal cases. Plus, they discuss news out of Wisconsin where ten fake Donald Trump electors settled a civil lawsuit admitting their actions were part of an effort to overturn the 2020 election.

Immunity Denied

In what could be his most consequential legal defeat yet, a federal judge rejects Donald Trump’s claims of presidential immunity in his 2020 election case. MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord break down what this – and a similar ruling in a parallel civil case --could mean for the ex-president. Plus, they'll talk GA where Trump’s lawyers say he shouldn’t be tried until 2029 if he wins next year’s election.

Bunker USA: The 5 key Donald Trump dramas you need to focus on

Donald Trump is never out of trouble. And it’s hard to keep up with his latest wrongdoing. Jacob Jarvis is joined by Andrew Rudalevige, Thomas Brackett Reed Professor of Government at Bowdoin College and a visiting professor at LSE, to go over the five key areas of drama you need to understand in the run up to 2024. • “If Trump were convicted of all 90 of his current felonies, he'd’ be looking at something like 700 years in prison.” • “Any private citizen not named Donald J. Trump would inevitably get convicted for espionage and obstruction of justice in the classified documents case” www.patreon.com/bunkercast  Written and presented by Jacob Jarvis. Producer: Eliza Davis Beard. Audio production: Simon Williams. Managing Editor: Jacob Jarvis. Music by Kenny Dickinson. THE BUNKER is a Podmasters Production. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Trump's Thanksgiving Threats

Donald Trump’s Thanksgiving threats take center stage as judges in NY and DC decide whether to reinstate his two gag orders. Plus, we’ll dig deeper into Trump’s charade of victimhood as he tries to get his federal election case in DC dismissed. All this, as Andrew and Mary celebrate 50 episodes of the pod!

Foreseeable Consequences

Donald Trump’s team and the U.S. government squared off in a DC appeals court over his latest attempt to undo a gag order issued against him in his federal election subversion case. MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord break down Trump’s claims and which way they think the three-judge panel is leaning. Plus, a judgein Colorado denies a motion to keep Trump off the ballot there in 2024 – but why some say the ruling is still a bad one for the former president.

Trump's Tumultuous Testimony

Donald Trump took the witness stand Monday in the biggest moment of his civil and criminal trials thus far. MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord dig into some of his big admissions and how badly he may have hurt himself. Plus, we’ll get into the former president’s latest efforts to delay his federal trials and the new criticism facing Judge Aileen Cannon in the FL documents case.